11
19–22 APRIL, 2017, BARCELONA, SPAIN
13:48–13:51
S1-7 (PP)
MALE INFANTS WITH HYPOSPADIAS OR CRYPTORCHIDISM
DO NOT SHOW A DIFFERENT INDEX FINGER/RING FINGER
RATIO THAN NORMAL BOYS
Ursula TONNHOFER
1
, Doris HEBENSTREIT
2
, Martin METZELDER
3
and Alexander SPRINGER
1
1) Medical University Vienna, Paediatric Urology, Vienna, AUSTRIA - 2) Wilhelminenspital der Stadt Wien, Department
of Urology, Vienna, AUSTRIA - 3) Medical University Vienna, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Vienna, AUSTRIA
PURPOSE
Studies have shown that the index finger/ring finger ratio (2/4DR) is sexually dimorphic (smaller
in male than female). It is believed that this represents different exposure to androgens in utero.
Pathogenesis of hypospadias and undescended testis (UDT) is also closely linked to androgen
action during pregnancy. In this study, we sought to determine if there are any differences in infants
with hypospadias and UDT and controls.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Patients were enrolled prospectively. Prior to surgery (under anesthesia) the length of the index fin-
ger and ring finger on both hands were measured using a standard caliper (from proximal crease to
the tip of the finger). The method of measurement has been proven for inter-observer reproducibility
before (Abbo et al., 2015). The groups were chosen to be homogeneous in age and children above
5 years of age were excluded. Hypospadias were classified according to the SIU classification.
RESULTS
The were 208 participants: 102 controls (mean 1.37, +/- 1.41 years), 41 mild hypospadias (mean
1.75, +/- 1.31 years), 20 severe hypospadias (mean 1.22, +/- 0,78 years), and 45 UDT (mean
1.54, +/- 1.16 years). Right hand: 2/4DR controls: 0,950 +/-0,062, mild hypospadias: 0,964+/-0,050,
severe hypospadias 0,950+/-0,050, UDT 0,952+/-0,040. Left hand: 2/4DR controls: 0,952+/-0,060,
mild hypospadias: 0,928+/-0,155, severe hypospadias 0,948+/-0,044, UDT 0,955+/-0,049. There
were no significant differences in any of the sub groups.
CONCLUSIONS
In our study (infants under the age of 5 years) we could not show any differences in the 2/4 digit
ratio for children with mild hypospadias, severe hypospadias, UDT, and controls. These findings are
in contrast to the literature which has shown significant differences in male/female, hypospadias,
UDT, male social behavior, testosterone levels and other items. One explanation could be that the
2/4 digit ratio dimorphism is not well developed in infants.
13:51–14:12
Discussion