Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  53 / 330 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 53 / 330 Next Page
Page Background

53

19–22 APRIL, 2017, BARCELONA, SPAIN

S5: VESICOURETERAL REFLUX 2

Moderators: Francisco Reed (Chile), Abraham Cherian (UK)

ESPU Meeting on Thursday 20, April 2017, 08:56–09:32

08:56–08:59

S5-1 (PP)

COMPARING THE OUTCOMES OF ANTIREFLUX

SURGERY WITH SUBMUCOSAL INJECTION IN CHILDREN

WITH VESICOURETERAL REFLUX

Fahimeh KAZEMI RASHED

1

, Mohammadreza ROSHANDEL

2

and Tannaz AGAYI

2

1) Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Urology, Tabriz, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN - 2) Tabriz University of Medical

Sciences, Urology, Tabriz, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN

PURPOSE

The treatment goal of vesicoureteral reflux is to preserve renal function by reducing the risk of infec-

tion and renal scarring. In this study we compare two kind of anti reflux treatment: Open antireflux

surgery and endoscopic injection of vantris .

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a clinical trial, 61 patients (100 renal units) with Vesicoureteral reflux based on pre-determined

inclusion and exclusion criteria, divided into two groups of Gil Vernet open surgery Vantris injection

and the results were compared.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics, Clinical symptoms, laboratory examination results of both groups

were same. The duration of follow-up in Vantris group was 8.81±1.65 months (1 to 22) and in the

surgical group was 7.57±0.89 months (3 to 26)(P=0.47).

Recovery and non-recovery after treatment in the Vantris group, was 48(98%) and 1(2%), respec-

tively, and in the surgical group was 47(96%) and 3 cases(4%)(P=0.62).

Full recovery after treatment in the Vantris group was in 40(81.6%) and in the surgical group, in

43(86%)(P=0.56).

After treatment, VUR occurred in the opposite side in the Vantris group in one case (3.2%) and in

the surgical group in two cases (6.7%)(P=0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

In the current study, the success rate of endoscopic treatment of VUR after the first injection of

Vantris in patients with II to IV reflux were compared with those treated with Gil-Vernet open surgery

methods. Accordingly, complete remission and overall recovery was observed in 81.6% and 98% in

the Vantris group and in 86% and 94% in the open surgery group, respectively (with no significant

difference).