Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  58 / 330 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 58 / 330 Next Page
Page Background

58

28

TH

CONGRESS OF THE ESPU

09:20–09:23

S5-6 (PP)

PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER RESULTS

FROM THE ROBOTIC VERSUS OPEN URETERAL

REIMPLANTATION (ROVOUR) STUDY GROUP:

COMPLICATIONS AND OUTCOMES FROM ROBOT-

ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC EXTRAVESICAL URETERAL

REIMPLANTATION (RALUR-EV), 2015 TO 2016

William R BOYSEN

1

, Lauren BELLEVILLE

2

, Jonathan S ELLISON

3

,

Thomas S LENDVAY

3

, Joan KO

4

, Ardavan AKHAVAN

4

, Michael GARCIA-ROIG

5

,

Jonathan HUANG

5

, Andrew KIRSCH

6

, Chester KOH

7

, Marion SCHULTE

8

,

Paul NOH

8

, Trudy KAWAL

9

, Arun SRINIVASAN

9

, Aseem SHUKLA

9

, Christine KIM

10

,

Francesca MONN

11

, Benjamin WHITTAM

11

and Mohan S GUNDETI

1

1) University of Chicago Medicine, Section of Urology, Chicago, USA - 2) University of Chicago, Section

of Urology, Chicago, USA - 3) Seattle Children’s Hospital, Pediatric Urology, Seattle, USA - 4) John’s Hopkins

University, Department of Urology, Baltimore, USA - 5) Emory University, Department of Urology, Atlanta,

USA - 6) Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Pediatric Urology, Atlanta, USA - 7) Texas Children’s Hospital, Pediatric

Urology, Houston, USA - 8) Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Pediatric Urology, Cincinnati, USA - 9) Children’s Hospital

of Philadelphia, Pediatric Urology, Philadelphia, USA - 10) Connecticut Children’s Hospital, Pediatric Urology, Hartford,

USA - 11) IU Health Riley Children’s Hospital, Department of Urology, Indianapolis, USA

PURPOSE

The use of RALUR-EV is increasing nationally, despite conflicting data on the safety and efficacy of

the procedure. We reviewed outcomes and complications from our multicenter cohort from 2015-

2016, hypothesizing that complications would be unchanged and outcomes improved with greater

surgeon experience.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We reviewed our prospective database of children who underwent RALUR-EV performed by expe-

rienced pediatric urologists (mean RALUR-EV case volume 28 prior to study period) at 9 centers

from 2015 to 2016. Radiographic failure was defined as persistent VUR on postoperative imaging.

Complications were graded using the Clavien scale. Statistical analysis was performed with univari-

ate regression.

RESULTS

A total of 142 patients (205 ureters) underwent RALUR-EV for primary VUR, with mean preopera-

tive VUR grade of 3.0 (SD 1.0). Of the 149 ureters studied with postoperative VCUG or RNC, radio-

graphic resolution was seen in 138 (92.6%). Transient urinary retention occurred in 4 of 63 bilateral

cases (6.3%). There were 8 grade 3 complications (5.6%) and no grade 4 or 5 complications.

On univariate regression analysis, detrusor tunnel length greater than 2.5cm was associated with

decreased odds of radiographic failure (OR 0.08, p=0.01). No other technical factors (tunnel closure

technique, apical suture, distal U-stitch) or patient factors (age, gender, weight, prior endoscopic

injection) were associated with radiographic failure (p>0.05). 

CONCLUSIONS

Radiographic success has improved to 92.6% with increased surgeon experience, and is on par

with the open approach for treatment of high grade VUR. RALUR-EV has a low complication rate

consistent with published series of open ureteral reimplantation. Tunnel length over 2.5cm is associ-

ated with decreased odds of radiographic failure, highlighting the importance of this technical factor.