Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  51 / 330 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 51 / 330 Next Page
Page Background

51

19–22 APRIL, 2017, BARCELONA, SPAIN

08:41–08:44

S4-5 (PP)

HOW DID OUR TREATMENTS BEFORE AND AFTER EAU/

ESPU VUR RISK GROUPING SYSTEM AFFECT OUR EARLY

SUCCESS RATES?

Eda TOKAT

1

, Serhat GUROCAK

1

, Iyimser URE

2

, Cenk ACAR

3

, Zafer SINIK

4

and Ozgur TAN

1

1) Gazi University School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Section of Paediatric Urology, Ankara, TURKEY -

2) Eskisehir Osmangazi University School Of Medicine, Department of Urology, Section of Paediatric Urology, EskISehIr,

TURKEY - 3) ERYAMAN HOSPITAL, Department of Urology, Ankara, TURKEY - 4) ODAK HOSPITAL, Department

of Urology, Denizli, TURKEY

PURPOSE

To compare the early clinical results of treatments performed before and after EAU/ESPU VUR

classification due to vesicoureteral reflux.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

296 out of 346 renal units with regular clinical follow-up data who were treated due to VUR between

2009-2016 were retrospectively reviewed by dividing our patients into two groups as before and

after 2013. Preoperative clinical parameters as grade and laterality of reflux, presence of renal

scar, initial and follow-up treatments , findings of medical treatment and surgical procedures were

analysed. Clinical failure was identified as; surgery for nonresponsive cases to medication, sympto-

matic urinary tract infection after surgery and new renal scar in postoperative DMSA.

RESULTS

Mean age and follow-up length were 75(6-132)months and 27,2(6-78)months respectively. In the

low risk group,clinical success rates of medical and surgical treatments before the risk classifica-

tion were %38,5 and %87,9 respectively. (Table). We determined that VUR risk grouping does not

change clinical success significantly in all groups (p0.062; p:0,063; p:0,459, respectively)

EAU/ESPU VUR classification

Medical treatment

(%)

Surgical

treatment (%)

p value

Low risk

Before 2013 Successful

5(38,5)

29(87,9)

0,062

Unsuccessful

8(61,5)

4(12,1)

After 2013

Successful

7 (36,8)

6 (100)

Unsuccessful

12 (63,2)

0

Moderate risk Before 2013 Successful

16(30,8)

83(90,2)

0,063

Unsuccessful

36(69,2)

9(9,8)

After 2013

Successful

2(16,7)

18(69,2)

Unsuccessful

10(83,3)

8(30,8)

High risk

Before 2013 Successful

1(10)

14(56)

0,459

Unsuccessful

16(94,1)

11(44)

After 2013

Successful

0

1 (100)

Unsuccessful

0

0

Total

113(38,2)

183(61,8)

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the fact that EAU/ESPU VUR risk classification changed our current practice in terms

of initial treatment method, this different approach did not seem to affect early clinical success

positively. There is still an absolute need for studies with larger sample size and long-term follow-up

to reach more reliable results.