Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  57 / 330 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 57 / 330 Next Page
Page Background

57

19–22 APRIL, 2017, BARCELONA, SPAIN

09:17–09:20

S5-5 (PP)

PEDIATRIC VESICOURETERAL REFLUX: A COMPARATIVE

STUDY AMONG STING PROCEDURE, LAPAROSCOPIC

LICH-GREGOIR PROCEDURE AND COHEN TECHNIQUE

USING OPEN SURGERY

Francesco TURRA’

1

, Ciro ESPOSITO

2

, Maria ESCOLINO

3

, Manuel LOPEZ

4

,

Antonio SAVANELLI

2

, Alessandra FARINA

2

, Alessandro SETTIMI

2

and Francois VARLET

4

1) Federico II University of Naples, Pediatric Surgery, Naples, ITALY - 2) Federico II University of Naples, Traslational

Medical Sciences, Naples, ITALY - 3) Federico II Unoversity of Naples, Traslational Medical Sciences, Naples, ITALY -

4) Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Hopital Nord, Saint-Etienne, France, Pediatric Urology, Saint-Etienne, FRANCE

PURPOSE

This retrospective trial compared the results and drawbacks of 3 surgical procedures currently

adopted for treatment of VUR: intravesical open Cohen, laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reim-

plantation according to Lich Gregoir (LEVUR) and endoscopic (STING) procedure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed 90 consecutive patients (mean age 4.86 years) operated in 2 pediatric surgical centers

for VUR. Exclusion criteria were I or V degree VUR, associated with megaureter requiring ureteral

tapering or patients already operated for VUR. Thirty patients underwent Cohen, 30 underwent

LEVUR and 30 underwent STING procedure. The groups were compared in regard to operative

time, hospitalization, postoperative pain, analgesic requirements, reflux persistence and complica-

tions. Statistical analysis was carried out using χ2 test and t-student test.

RESULTS

Operative time was shorter using STING compared to the other techniques (28.17 min [STING] vs

125,50 min [LEVUR] vs 135,68 min [Cohen]; p < 0.001). Hospitalization was statistically shorter

using STING and LEVUR compared to Cohen (3.10 vs 12.71 days ; p < 0.003). The VAS pain score

were worse after Cohen (p < 0.001). Hematuria occurred only after Cohen (p < 0.001). Analgesic

requirements were higher after Cohen compared to STING and LEVUR (4.91 vs 1.21 days ; p <

0.001). Reflux persistence was higher after STING (13 cases vs 11 Cohen and 4 LEVUR). Cohen

presented more complications compared to LEVUR and STING (p=0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

Comparing the 3 techniques it seems that LEVUR presents a high success rate as Cohen proce-

dure, but also all the advantages of STING with a short and painless post-operative period, without

hematuria.