Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  210 / 330 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 210 / 330 Next Page
Page Background

210

28

TH

CONGRESS OF THE ESPU

17:23–17:26

S19-9 (PP)

PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF RADIATION DOSE

AT SKIN ENTRANCE WITH FLUOROSCOPIC VOIDING

CYSTOURETHROGRAM IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS

Rajeev CHAUDHRY

1

, Pankaj DANGLE

2

, Patrick FOX

1

, Wael ABDALLA

3

,

Helen BRADLEY

3

, Mark DURANKO

3

, Michael SHEETZ

3

, Glenn CANNON

1

,

Francis SCHNECK

1

, Michael OST

1

and Heidi STEPHANY

1

1) Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pediatric Urology, Pittsburgh, USA - 2) Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh

of UPMC, Pediatric Urology, Pittsburgh, USA - 3) Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pediatric Radiology,

Pittsburgh, USA

PURPOSE

A voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) is a source of ionizing radiation exposure to pediatric patients.

The actual radiation dose absorbed by the patient has not been accurately reported. We prospec-

tively measure radiation dose during VCUG using a single point dosimeter.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Pediatric patients undergoing a VCUG were prospectively enrolled in the study. Dosimeters

(nanoDot™OSL) were affixed to the skin overlying the sacrum. Siemens™ Axiom Luminos TF

fluoroscopic machine was used, and skin-to-source distance was fixed at 60 cm, beam collimated to

the smallest area possible, low dose setting applied, and fluoroscopy pulsed at 3 frames/sec. Dose

area product determined by xray source and dose received by dosimeter (mGy) were measured

and compared.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were prospectively enrolled in our study with a median age of 12 months (IQR

4-48), median body mass index (BMI) of 17.2 (IQR 16.6-18.6), and female predominance (66%).

Median fluoroscopic time was 54 seconds (IQR 33-76.5).  The median dose area product (mGy*m

2

)

was 6.55 (IQR 4.1-10.1) and median radiation dose absorbed at the skin entrance per dosimeter

(mGy) was 0.32 (IQR 0.11-0.58, range .01-2.9) (p=0.01). There was no correlation between ab-

sorbed dose and BMI (r = 0.12, p = 0.5), and fluoroscopy time and BMI (r = 0.23, p = 0.18). There

was a positive correlation between fluoroscopy time and absorbed dose (mGy) (r = 0.65, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The radiation dose absorbed at skin entrance is low for a single VCUG when employing tight col-

limation, low dose settings and pulsed fluoroscopy without compromising the quality of the image.

17:26–17:40

Discussion