Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  215 / 330 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 215 / 330 Next Page
Page Background

215

19–22 APRIL, 2017, BARCELONA, SPAIN

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 3360 children who underwent Circumplast (CC) and Plastibell circumci-

sion (PC) under local anaesthesia at a community clinic from May 2014 to October 2016. Parents

were given detailed information and consented preoperatively in children with potential risks. This

was provided verbally and in written format.

All complications were reviewed by a paediatric surgeon. All preputial adhesions were separated

under anaesthetic cream. Buried penis was treated conservatively. Incomplete circumcisions were

corrected by excision of excess skin. Acquired phimosis was treated by steroid, simple double

incision of the scar and surgical reconstruction. Complications were further looked for CC and PC.

Follow-up visits were arranged in all cases.

RESULTS

A total incidence of cosmetic complications in this cohort was 2.3% (n=77/3360) in NMC. Causes

of adherent penile skin or incomplete penile exposure included preputial adhesions (1.3%), buried

penis (0.5%), acquired phimosis (0.4%) and incomplete circumcision (0.1%). There is no signifi-

cant difference in the complications between CC (2.2 % n=22/1002) and PC (2.3% n= 55/2357)

(p>0.05). Preputial adhesions were higher in PC (1.5%) than CC (0.8%) but not statistically signifi-

cant. Acquired phimosis was treated by steroid (n=2), simple double incision of the scar (n=6) and

surgical reconstruction (n=8). The mean age of the children was 6.5 ± 1.4 months (median 2.1).

Mean follow-up was 96 days (range 5 to 373).

CONCLUSIONS

Children with cosmetic complications following NMC by disposable rings can be prevented by

meticulous perioperative management. Parental education and surgical expertise is required to

minimise these complications.

S19-16 (P without presentation)

GENITOURINARY INVOLVEMENT

AND URINARY DIVERSIONS IN PAEDIATRIC PATIENTS

WITH EPIDERMOLYSIS BULLOSA

Eleni PAPAGEORGIOU

1

, Naima SMEULDERS

2

, Imran MUSHTAQ

3

, Peter CUCKOW

3

,

Anna MARTINEZ

4

and Abraham CHERIAN

3

1) Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Trust, Pediatric Urology, London, UNITED KINGDOM - 2) Great Ormond Street

Hospital, NHS Trust, Pediatric Urology, London, UNITED KINGDOM - 3) Great Ormond Street Hospital, NHS Trust,

Pediatric Urology, London, UNITED KINGDOM - 4) Great Ormond Street Hospital, NHS Trust, Pediatric Dermatology,

London, UNITED KINGDOM

INTRODUCTION

Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB) is a rare genetic skin disorder with variable systemic involvement. We

present our experience over the last 30 years, focussing on genitourinary involvement and urinary

diversions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of all EB patients with urological problems between1986-2016 classified

into Group A: specific urinary-tract anomaly and Group B: general-urology of childhood. Statistical

analysis: Fisher-test.

RESULTS

Twenty male patients were identified: 8(40%) junctional-EB (subtype:1-Herlitz, 4-non-Herlitz,

3-non-Herlitz with pyloric-atresia), 9(45%) dystrophic-EB (5-recessive, 3-dominant, 1-transient-

epidermolysis-of-the-newborn) and 3(15%) simplex-EB.