Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  206 / 330 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 206 / 330 Next Page
Page Background

206

28

TH

CONGRESS OF THE ESPU

17:11–17:14

S19-5 (PP)

VALIDATION OF THE HOPE QUALITY ASSURANCE

SCORE ON POSTOPERATIVE RESULTS AFTER SUTURED

OR SUTURELESS CIRCUMCISION

Charlotte VANDERSTAPPEN

1

, Guy BOGAERT

1

, Hendrik-Jan FLORIN

1

and Marleen VAN DEN HEIJKANT

2

1) UZLeuven, Pediatric urology, Leuven, BELGIUM - 2) UZLeuven, Gasthuisberg Campus, Urology, Leuven, BELGIUM

PURPOSE

The cosmetic aspect of the penis is an important factor for parents, not only after hypospadias

repair, but also after circumcision. The HOPE score (hypospadias objective penile score) is an

excellent tool for quality assurance after hypospadias repair. To study the HOPE score on postop-

erative outcome after circumcision, we have used the scoring system in children who underwent

circumcision with sutures or sutureless with fibrin glue. 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Boys between 3 months and 10 years of age were randomized in this ethically approved study

between a sutured circumcision (Vicryl

®

5.0 rapide) (21 patients) or a sutureless circumcision

with fibrin glue (Dermabond

®

) (20 patients). Pictures were taken before surgery and 4 to 6 weeks

after surgery. Standardized pictures were evaluated independently by medical students, urology

residents, pediatric urologists using the HOPE score. The 2 groups were assessed using the two

sample t-test to compare both surgical techniques. The inter-observer reliability was assessed us-

ing the intraclass correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the HOPE score on the postoperative cosmetic aspect of the penis

between the two techniques; the overall HOPE score of sutured circumcisions was 46,15 ±3,17 vs

sutureless circumcisions 46,75 ±2,37 (p > 0,05). The HOPE score items “Shape of the skin” and

“rotation” were items that were able to differentiate in an objective quality parameter. The inter-

observer reliability was strong (0,862). 

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, sutured and sutureless circumcisions resulted in similar HOPE score results. As it will

be more and more important in the future to have quality assurance scores for surgical outcome,

it would be beneficial to have a singular objective scoring system for hypospadias and circumci-

sion. The HOPE score has also shown to be an excellent quality assurance tool for postoperative

circumcision scoring.