Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  205 / 330 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 205 / 330 Next Page
Page Background

205

19–22 APRIL, 2017, BARCELONA, SPAIN

16:56–16:59

S19-4 (PP)

EVALUATING EFFECTS OF THREATS AND TEAM EFFICACY

ON EFFICIENCY IN A PEDIATRIC UROLOGY OPERATING

ROOM

Jessica M MING

1

, Michael E CHUA

1

, Fadi ZU’BI

1

, Eric PHAM-HUNG

2

, Bisma AMIR

1

,

Edward HICKEY

2

and Martin A KOYLE

1

1) Hospital for Sick Children, Urology, Toronto, CANADA - 2) Hospital for Sick Children, Cardiovascular Surgery, Toronto,

CANADA

PURPOSE

Minor threats and errors in the operating room (OR) can lead to harmful complications in patient

safety as well as decreased efficiency in relatively straightforward operations. We implemented the

aviation industry’s “threat and error” management model to patients’ operations. Our aim was to

increase the identification of systemic threats and associated errors within pediatric urology operat-

ing room by using “line operating safety audits” (LOSA). 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

After QI committee approval, 75 inguinal-srotal, penile and laparoscopic cases were prospectively

observed by 2 independent observers. LOSAevaluation forms assessed 3 phases:I - wheels in- first

incision, II - incision- last stitch, III - final stitch- wheels out. From this, two independent observers

assessed: time vs. delay and number of threats per case (co-morbidities, equipment failure, distrac-

tion, sterility, failure of communication) using LOSA evaluation forms. The Oxford NOTECH II rating

system was used to evaluate the non-technical skills of the OR teams (surgical, anesthetic and

nursing). Data was tabulated and assessed for downstream errors or correlation to OR efficiency.

RESULTS

Mean number of threats per penile or scrotal case was 2.71+2.1 and 1.64+1.4, while for lapa-

roscopic cases mean number of threats was 7.5+3.5. We found no correlation between number

of threats and delays to the OR or to the phase in which these threats occurred. No significant

errors resulted from these threats amongst the cases observed. Amongst the two observers, mean

NOTECH scores in phase I, II and III were 73.7+2.5, 73.9+2.7, and 73.0+2.1.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to short OR times and few complications (harm) identified, threats relating to OR efficiency

were not identified. Patient safety and teamwork were consistently maintained according to the

NOTECH scoring results. We next plan to evaluate how team performance affects overall patient

outcomes (length of stay, complications, and OR throughput).

16:59–17:11

Discussion