Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  195 / 330 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 195 / 330 Next Page
Page Background

195

19–22 APRIL, 2017, BARCELONA, SPAIN

S17-16 (P without presentation)

COMPARING DOUBLE J STENT, EXTERNALIZED

STENTS AND NO STENTS FOLLOWING PYELOPLASTIES

IN INFANTS: DO THEY CHANGE THE FUNCTIONAL

OUTCOME?

Mohammad BADER

1

, Andrew ROBB

2

, Harish CHANDRAN

2

, Karan PARASHAR

2

and Liam MCCARTHY

2

1) Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Paediatric Urology, Birmingham, UNITED KINGDOM - 2) Birmingham

Children’s Hospital, Paediatric Urolgoy, Birmingham, UNITED KINGDOM

PURPOSE

There are advantages and disadvantages of different Stents. Similarly stentless pyeloplasties are

not without complications. We compared stented (Double J stents(JJ), externalized stents(ES))

and stentless (SL) pyeloplasties in infants over 13 years period to see a difference in the functional

outcome and complications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All infants who presented with PUJ obstruction were identified from a prospectively collected

database from 2000 to 2013. All infants had open dismembered pyeloplasties. The demograph-

ics, history, pre and post-operative radiological imaging, operation records and follow up data was

analysed. Infants were grouped into 3. Group A were SL, group B had ES and group C had JJ.

Although one surgeon preferred JJ stent but generally they were reserved for infants who had

concomitant VUJ obstruction.

Data given as median (inter-quartile range) and percentage where applicable. Anova test and

paired T test were used to compare the groups. p<0.05 taken as significant.

RESULTS

We reviewed 188 renal units in 185 infants. Age at operation, follow up duration, drainage and loss

of function data is summarized in the table. There was some improvement in function in Group A,

no improvement in group B and slight drop in Group C but none of these were statistical significant.

There was no statistical difference in postoperative leaks (p=0.27), infections(p=0.76), recurrences

(p=0.45), and redo pyeloplasties (p=0.3. Nephrectomies were more common in Group C as com-

pared to other groups (p<0.05).

Group A Group B Group C p value

Number

110

42

36

Age at operation (Months)

7

(5-8.9)

5

(4-7)

5.3

(2.9-7.9)

p<0.01

Follow up duration (years)

2.4

2.2

4.65

p<0.05

Improved drainage (%)

85

83

75

p=0.36

Mean Function (preop:post op) (%)

39:41

40:40

46:43

A:p=0.17

B:p=0.67

C:p=0.26

CONCLUSIONS

Transanastomotic drainage after pyeloplasty in children is controversial. On comparing 3 groups,

although there was no differences in functional outcome in any of these groups. Although nephrec-

tomy rate was significant in JJ stent group.