Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  191 / 238 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 191 / 238 Next Page
Page Background

191

11–14 APRIL, 2018, HELSINKI, FINLAND

13:11–13:14

S26-5 (PP)

EPIDURAL ANALGESIA DECREASES NARCOTIC

REQUIREMENTS IN LOW LEVEL SPINA BIFIDA PATIENTS

Joshua ROTH 

1

, Rosalia MISSERI 

1

, Stephanie WHITTAKER 

2

, Francesca MONN 

3

, Aali

SHAH 

2

, Nicole HORN 

2

, Mark CAIN 

1

and Morton GREEN 

2

1) Riley Hospital for Children, Urology, Indianapolis, USA - 2) Riley Hospital for Children, Anesthesia, Indianapolis,

USA - 3) Indiana University Health, Urology, Indianapolis, USA

PURPOSE

Epidural analgesia use in low level spina bifida patients (LLSB) during labor and delivery has been

reported, however, its post-operative use has not been studied or reported. We hypothesize that

thoracic epidural placement in the T9-T10 interspace is safe and decreases narcotic requirements

in LLSB following open lower urinary tract reconstruction (LUTR).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive LLSB who had LUTR and received epidurals at our

institution from 4/16 to 10/17. We matched controls with LLSB who received tap blocks with similar

procedures from 12/13–10/17. Ropivicaine 0.2 % was infused at a rate of 0.4 mg/kg/hr in epidurals.

Patients received prn diazepam, acetaminophen, ketorolac and either IV narcotics or a patient

controlled analgesia (PCA) pump. Opioid consumption was calculated utilizing equivalent IV mor-

phine doses. Mean and maximum pain scores on post-operative day (POD) 0–3 were calculated.

Descriptive statistics were performed.

RESULTS

10 LLSB who had LUTR and epidurals were matched to 10 LLSB who had LUTR and tap blocks at

our institution. Groups were demographically similar. All had full abdominal sensation and functional

levels at or below L3. Pain scores were the same or improved in the epidural group. The epidural

group had decreased opioid consumption on POD 0–3 (0.80 mg/kg vs. 1.50 mg/kg, p=0.026). No

epidural complications or changes in functional status were noted.

Patients with epidurals had significantly lower overall narcotic requirements when adjusting for age

and PCA availability (p=0.042). Patients with a PCA used more narcotics when adjusting for age

and epidural (0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracic epidural analgesia is a safe and effective option to assist with post-operative pain manage-

ment following LUTR in LLSB.