Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  188 / 330 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 188 / 330 Next Page
Page Background

188

28

TH

CONGRESS OF THE ESPU

15:23–15:26

S17-8 (PP)

CLINICAL OUTCOMES AND THE FATE OF THE UPPER

URINARY TRACT AFTER URETERAL CLIPPING

FOR THE TREATMENT OF LOW-FUNCTIONING KIDNEYS

OR NON-FUNCTIONING UPPER POLE RENAL MOIETIES

ASSOCIATED WITH ECTOPIC URETER OR OBSTRUCTIVE

URETEROCELE

Roberto IGLESIAS LOPES

1

, Jose Nicolas FERNANDEZ

1

, Joana DOS SANTOS

1

,

Jaime PEREZ

2

, Martin Allan KOYLE

1

and Armando Jose LORENZO

1

1) The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Toronto, CANADA

- 2) Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Division of Urology, Department of Surgery,

Bogota, COLOMBIA

PURPOSE

Evaluate clinical outcomes and hydronephrosis evolution after ureteral clipping for the treatment of

low-functioning kidneys or non-functioning renal moieties associated with ectopic ureter or obstruc-

tive ureterocele.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Prospectively data collection on 25 consecutive patients (17 female, 8 male) who underwent

ureteral clipping between 02/2011 and 08/2016. Patients were divided in four groups [1: duplex

kidney with ectopic ureter (48%); 2: duplex with large ureterocele (16%); 3: duplex with progressive

upper pole dilatation (12%); 4: single-system low or non-functioning kidneys (24%)] and followed

postoperatively for clinical outcomes and trends in hydronephrosis of the ligated units over time. 

RESULTS

Median age at surgery was 67 months (range: 5-205). Mean operative time was 106.6±33.7 min

(range: 20-180) and length of stay 12.1±7.7 hours. Immediate resolution of urinary incontinence

was observed in all cases of duplex systems associated with ectopic ureters (10 pts). After a mean

follow-up of 24.4±14.7 months, 96% of the patients remained asymptomatic. No significant difer-

ences were observed between the initial and last measures of pelvis anteroposterior (9 and 17 mm)

and ureteral diameter (9.5 and 14 mm). All ureteroceles showed a significant decrease after clip-

ping (27.2 ± 4mm to 5.3±9.2mm, p=0.007). One patient (4%) developed pyonephrosis two months

postoperatively and required a laparoscopic nephrectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Ureteral clipping is a safe and effective treatment in this setting, with the obvious advantage of being

a much simpler and quicker surgical approach over extirpative or reconstructive porcedures.