Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  175 / 330 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 175 / 330 Next Page
Page Background

175

19–22 APRIL, 2017, BARCELONA, SPAIN

13:52–13:55

S16-4 (PP)

PROXY- AND SELF-REPORTED OUTCOME AFTER

SURGERY IN DSD PATIENTS

Marion RAPP

1

, Lise DURANTEAU

2

, Robert RÖHLE

3

, Tim VAN DE GRIFT

4

, Angelica

Linden HIRSCHBERG

5

, Susanne KREGE

6

, Justine SCHOBER

7

, Claire BOUVATTIER

2

,

Peggy COHEN-KETTENIS

4

, Birgit KÖHLER

3

, Anna NORDENSTRÖM

8

, Ute THYEN

9

and Agneta NORDENSKJÖLD

8

1) University of Lübeck, Department of Pediatrics, Lübeck, GERMANY - 2) HUPS (Bicêtre), Le Kremlin-Bicêtre,

FRANCE - 3) Charité, Berlin, GERMANY - 4) VU Medical Center, Department of Medical Psychology, Hv Amsterdam,

NETHERLANDS - 5) Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Department for Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Solna, SWEDEN

- 6) Klinikum Essen Mitte, Department of Urology, Essen, GERMANY - 7) UPMC Hamot, Department of Urology, Erie,

USA - 8) Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Solna, SWEDEN - 9) University of Lübeck, Department of Pedatrics, Lübeck,

GERMANY

PURPOSE

Outcome studies of genital surgery in disorders of sex development (DSD) often lack the

patient’s perspective. We describe observer’s and patient’s satisfaction with the anatomical and

functional result after genital surgery in a large European cohort.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

1040 adolescents (>15 yrs.) and adults with DSD took part in a cross-sectional multicentre clinical

evaluation study in six European countries in 2014/15. Diagnoses were Turner syndrome (n=301),

45,XO/46,XY (n=45), Klinefelter syndrome (n=218), XYY (n=1), 46,XY DSD (n =219) and 46,XX

DSD (n=256). Study protocol included a clinical report file, an optional gynaecological/urological

examination and a patient reported outcome including received surgical interventions, and opinions

about the anatomical and functional outcome.

RESULTS

500 of 1040 participants were subjected to genital surgery with the highest rate in 46,XY DSD

and the lowest in Turner syndrome. 303 participants got a feminising and 125 a masculinising

surgery and overall 217 underwent gonadectomy. Of those who answered the patient reported

outcome 13 % were (very) dissatisfied with anatomical appearance and function. Participant’s view

correlated positively with the examiner’s view in case of anatomical appearance. Regarding specific

interventions clitoridectomy had a very negative effect on participant’s life and one third experienced

a negative one of gonadectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Irreversible removal of organs was regarded most negatively. Physicians should be aware of its

possible long-lasting negative effect on patient’s life. Patient reported outcome should be evaluated

whenever possible to gain as much understanding of the influence of genital surgery in DSD on

future life as possible.