Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  327 / 330 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 327 / 330 Next Page
Page Background

327

19–22 APRIL, 2017, BARCELONA, SPAIN

S6: POSTERS

Moderators: Lynne Bartlett (UK), Hanny Cobussen (Netherlands)

ESPU-Nurses Meeting on Friday 21, April 2017, 11:20–11:35

11:20–11:25

S6-1 (PP)

COMPARISON OF DURABILITY OF DIFFERENT SMALL

BALLOON CATHETERS FOR TRANSANAL IRRIGATION

Sofi SIGVARDSSON and Mattias GRÄNFORS

Wellspect IH, Molndal, SWEDEN

PURPOSE

Transanal irrigation (TAI) is a well-documented bowel-management therapy in children with neu-

rogenic bowel disorder, anorectal malformation and Hirschprung. In TAI, rectal catheters with an

inflatable balloon is used. However, balloon burst is a frequent complication and may be a traumatic

experience and potentially lead to bowel perforation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

First, the Navina™Small and Peristeen™Small catheter, respectively, was attached to an electronic

pump blowing air into the balloon. Diameter of the balloon at time of burst was measured. Second,

the respective catheter was put into a rigid plastic tube with a diameter of 46 mm and the balloon

was inflated with an electronic pump. The length of the balloon inside the tube was measured at

balloon burst. Time to burst and pressure at burst were measured in all 30 experiments. Differences

in mean were statistically tested using the Student’s t-test.

RESULTS

The Navina™ Small catheter showed statistically significant higher durability in all measurements

compared with the Peristeen™ Small catheter. Mean (SD) value of diameter, time and pressure at

burst in air were 72.5 (1.1) mm, 19.4 (1.3) sec, 493 (20) mbar and 66.8 (0.6) mm, 10.1 (0.3) sec,

243 (4.3) mbar in Navina™ and Peristeen™ respectively (p<0.001). Mean (SD) value of length, time

and pressure at burst in plastic tube were 8.4 (0.3) cm, 13.3 (1.3) sec, 687 (58) mbar and 7.0 (0.2)

cm, 7.2 (0.2) sec, 377 (16) mbar in Navina™ and Peristeen™ respectively (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that catheter balloon durability can differ between TAI systems and that safety with

the catheter balloon can be enhanced. This need to be further investigated in vivo.