Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  299 / 330 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 299 / 330 Next Page
Page Background

299

19–22 APRIL, 2017, BARCELONA, SPAIN

In this video, we present a case of laparoscopic vaginoplasty using the Davydov technique. The

technique is applied with the patient in the gynecological position. First, laparoscopic exploration

exposes the Douglas pouch. Thereafter the vaginal space is created from the perineum. With the

help of a thick bougie dilator, the pelvic peritonium is dissected laparoscopically and then with-

drawn to the perineum using clamps introduced from the perineum. Once suitable vaginal depth is

acheived a thick purse string suture is used the seperate the peritoneum from the vaginal cavity.

The peritoneum - perineum anastomosis is performed from the perineal aspect.

The most important advantages of vaginoplasty using the peritoneum is no requirement for loss of

continuity of bowels and no mucous secretion.

VS-28 (VS without presentation)

LAPAROSCOPIC MANAGEMENT OF ECTOPIC URETER

WITH VAGINAL INSERTION DIAGNOSED IN ADULT FEMALE

Krzysztof RATAJCZYK

1

, Adrian CZEKAJ

2

, Marek FIUTOWSKI

2

, Pawel PIOTROW

2

and Pawel KOWAL

2

1) Regional Specialistic Hospital In Wroclaw, Department of Urology, Wroclaw, POLAND - 2) Regional Specialistic

Hospital in Wroclaw, Departament of Urology, Wroclaw, POLAND

INTRODUCTION

Ectopic ureters are rare and usually accompanied with double collecting system. Ectopic ureter with

the orifice in urethra distal to external sphincter or emptying to uterus, vagina and vestibulum may

cause incontinence in females. We present a late diagnosed case of ectopic insertion of right upper

pole ureter to the lateral vaginal wall.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A 27-year-old female patient with normal urination presented with a continuous urine dribbling

since her childhood. Ultrasound and urodynamic study results were normal. IV urography identified

bilateral double collecting system. MR urography showed right upper pole ureter emptying to the

vagina. An embolisation attempt was made to functionally disable upper pole collecting system of

the right kidney. It was unsuccessful due to a lack of renal artery branches specific to upper pole

on the angiography. Therefore, the surgical treatment was indicated. Double - J stent was inserted

preoperatively to aid identification of lower pole ureter. The patient underwent a transperitoneal

laparoscopic ureteropielostomy. The anastomosis of the upper pole ureter to the lower pole pelvis

was made using 4-0 monofilament running suture.

RESULTS

The surgical time was 145 min and estimated blood loss 100 cc. The double - J stent was removed

on the first postoperative day after no leakage had been observed. The patient presented with no

perioperative complications and was discharged on the third postoperative day. At three months

follow-up, the patient was dry and had non-dilated right renal collecting system on ultrasound.

CONCLUSIONS

Detection of ectopic ureter with vaginal insertion in adulthood is extremely rare. Magnetic resonance

urography is the most appropriate imaging tool for determining renal collecting system anatomy and

localising ectopic ureteral orifice. Laparoscopic ureteropielostomy is a safe and feasible treatment

option of ectopic ureter and double collecting system for a female patient in reproductive age.