Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  248 / 330 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 248 / 330 Next Page
Page Background

248

28

TH

CONGRESS OF THE ESPU

11:07–11:12

S23-2 (LO)

A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN

EMERGENCY AND ELECTIVE URETEROSCOPY

FOR ACUTELY OBSTRUCTING URETERAL STONES

IN CHILDREN

Ahmed FAHMY, Mohamed YOUSSIF, Haytham BADAWAY, Walid DAWOUD

and Samir ORABI

Alexandria University, Urology Department, Alexandria, EGYPT

PURPOSE

Emergency ureteroscopy for acutely obstructing ureteral stone in children offer the advantages of

immediate stone fragmentation, relief of patient’s pain and parents’ anxiety. The aim of this study is

to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the emergency ureteroscopic management of ureteral stones

immediately after a first attack of renal colic in children.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixty children were prospectively randomized between two groups; group 1 (n= 30 patients) who

underwent emergency ureteroscopy within 24 hours of admission to emergency department and

group 2 (n= 30) who underwent elective ureteroscopy more than 2 weeks after the attack.

Unfavorable endoscopic appearance of the ureter including; mucosal hyperemia, edema, inflam-

matory polys and tight ureteric rings were reported in both groups. We compared stone-free rate,

operative time, incidence of complications during and after ureteroscopy and the length of postop-

erative stay between both groups.

RESULTS

Unfavorable endoscopic appearance of the ureter was more prevalent in group 1 (40% vs 13.3%)

No significant difference in stone free rate (83.3 vs 90%) were observed between both groups.

However, intraoperative complication were significantly higher in group 1 (perforation with mild

extravasation in 2 pts, postoperative hematuria in 4 pts , one case of febrile UTI) versus one case

of hematuria and another case of febrile UTI in group 2. Postoperative stay was significantly longer

in group 1 compared to group 2 (2.2 days vs 1.4 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency ureteroscopy is not recommended in case of acutely obstructing ureteric stone in chil-

dren. Elective ureteroscopy has a lower morbidity with the potential advantage of allowing ample

time for clearing of infection, inflammation and theoretical possibility of spontaneous stone passage.