Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  58 / 238 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 58 / 238 Next Page
Page Background

58

29

th

CONGRESS OF THE ESPU

MATERIAL AND METHODS

334 renal units with regular clinical follow-up who were treated due to VUR(vesicoureteral reflux)

between years 2009–2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative clinical parameters as

grade and laterality of reflux, presence of renal scar, initial and follow-up treatments, findings of

medical treatment and surgical procedures were analysed by grouping patients according to initial

treatment year,as before and after 2013. Clinical outcomes of surgical and medical treatments

were compared in both groups; before and after 2013. Clinical failure was identified as; performing

surgery for nonresponsive cases to medication, symptomatic urinary tract infection after surgery

and new renal scar in postoperative DMSA.

RESULTS

Mean age and follow-up duration were 71,4(6–216)months and 47(4–141)months, respectively.

We determined that VUR risk grouping does not change clinical success significantly in all risk

groups (table)

VUR RISK GROUP INITIAL TREATMENT

YEAR

TREATMENT

SUCCESS

MEDICAL(%)

SURGERY(%)

LOW RISK

BEFORE 2013

SUCCESSFULL

2(13)

38(93)

UNSUCCESSFULL

13(87)

3(7)

AFTER 2013

SUCCESSFULL

0

1(25)

UNSUCCESSFULL

4(100)

3(75)

p VALUE

0.4

<0.001

MODERATE RISK

BEFORE 2013

SUCCESSFULL

5(11)

95(93)

UNSUCCESSFULL

39(89)

7(7)

AFTER 2013

SUCCESSFULL

5(25)

11(78)

UNSUCCESSFULL

15(75)

3(22)

p VALUE

0.164

0.069

HIGH RISK

BEFORE 2013

SUCCESSFULL

1(5)

32(58)

UNSUCCESSFULL

19(95)

23(42)

AFTER 2013

SUCCESSFULL

0

4(67)

UNSUCCESSFULL

9(100)

2(33)

p VALUE

0.495

0.688

TOTAL

112(34)

222(66)

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the fact that EAU/ESPU VUR risk classification changed our current practice in terms

of initial treatment method, this different approach did not seem to affect early clinical success

positively. There is still an absolute need for studies with larger sample size and long-term follow-up

to reach more reliable results.

09:04–09:19

Discussion