Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  180 / 238 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 180 / 238 Next Page
Page Background

180

29

th

CONGRESS OF THE ESPU

12:01–12:04

S24-4 (PP)

THE ROLE OF METABOLIC EVALUATION IN PEDIATRIC

PATIENTS WITH UROLITHIASIS

Alfredo BERRETTINI 

1

, Francesca TARONI 

2

, Mirella MOGIATTI 

1

, Giuseppina

MARRA 

2

, Dario Guido MINOLI 

1

, Erika Adalgisa DE MARCO 

1

, Giovanni MONTINI 

2

and

Gianantonio MANZONI 

1

1) Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Fondazione Cà Granda, Pediatric Urology Unit, Milan, ITALY - 2) Ospedale Maggiore

Policlinico, Fondazione Cà Granda, Pediatric Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplant Unit, Depart of Clinical Sciences and

Community Health, Milan, ITALY

PURPOSE

Urolithiasis is a rare and underestimated condition and its incidencehas increased in the last few

decades. In pediatric age, more often than in adults, it can be linked to pathologies that could

determine irreversible damage of renal function. Moreover, sometimes urolithiasis may be the first

manifestation of major metabolic and genetic diseases. Thus, It is important to diagnose the precise

pathology and to define specific medical and surgical treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data from patients regularly followed up in our clinic from 2007–2017 for urolithiasis were retrospec-

tively reviewed to assess the prevalence of rare diseases and to evaluate possible associated risk

factors. We included only those patients (142 out of 190) who completed the metabolic evaluation:

renal function, acid-base balance, PTH, vitamin D, urinary electrolytes, oxaluria, urinary cystine,

citrate and uric acid. All patients underwent an abdominal US and X-ray.

RESULTS

Nephrolithiasis was secondary to a rare disease in 29 patients (20 %) (Table 1). The most common

clinical presentation was flank/abdominal pain in 60 patients (42 %). In children with rare diseases

the only risk factors that appeared statistically significant (p< 0.05) were the age < 4 years old

(p:0.000003), male sex (p:0.026834), nephrocalcinosis (p:0.000033), stone >1 cm (p < 0.05) and

bilateral stones (p:0.00001) (Table 2).

CONCLUSIONS

20 % of patients with urolithiasis had an associated rare disease. In the presence of risk factors

extended investigations are mandatory in order to exclude a potential rare disease.

Rare Disease

N. 29

Cystinuria

21

APRT Deficiency

2

Hypersensivity to Vitamin D

2

Xantinuria

1

Lesh Nhyan

1

Dend Syndrome

1

Oxalosis

1