Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  178 / 238 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 178 / 238 Next Page
Page Background

178

29

th

CONGRESS OF THE ESPU

11:49–11:52

S24-2 (PP)

SPONTANEOUS PASSAGE OF <=1CM URETERAL STONES

IN CHILDREN: IS THERE A PREDICTING FACTOR?

Ahmet Midhat ELMACI 

1

, Muhammet Irfan DONMEZ 

2

, Fatih AKIN 

3

and Metin

GUNDUZ 

4

1) Dr. Ali Kemal Belviranli Women's Maternity and Children's Hospital, Pediatric Nephrology, Konya, TURKEY - 2) Dr. Ali

Kemal Belviranli Women's Maternity and Children's Hospital, Pediatric Urology, Konya, TURKEY - 3) Necmettin Erbakan

University Meram Medical Faculty, Pediatrics, Konya, TURKEY - 4) Selcuk University Medical Faculty, Pediatric Surgery,

Konya, TURKEY

PURPOSE

To analyze if there were any factors that could predict spontaneous passage of ≤1 cm ureteral

stones in children.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The files of the patients diagnosed with ureteral stone between 2008–2017 from two different

hospitals were retrospectively reviewed. Detection of ureteral stones were done using ultrasonog-

raphy and computed tomography when needed. Patients were either conservatively or surgically

managed. Conservative treatment included adequate hydration and pain management whereas

surgical treatment included ureterorenoscopic intervention. Patients were referred for surgical

treatment after 15 days of follow-up with no spontaneous passage. Factors such as; age, gender,

type of hematuria (macroscopic/microscopic), presence of dysuria, abdominal/side pain, irritability,

vomiting, stone localization (proximal/mid/distal ureter), laterality, presence of concomitant kidney

stone, degree of hydronephrosis, stone size and stone composition were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 70 patients (32 males, 38 females; mean age 5.5±4.4 years) were found to have been

diagnosed with ≤1 cm ureteral stone (mean maximum diameter 6.7±2.3 mm). Diagnosis was made

using ultrasonography in 47 patients and computed tomography in 23 patients. Spontaneous pas-

sage of the ureteral stone was observed in 40 patients. Stone composition of 22 patients were

available (17 calcium oxalate, 4 cystine, 1 uric acid). Stone size was found to be the only factor

that could predict spontaneous passage (5.19±1.59 vs 8.90±1.27, p<0.001). Interestingly, stone

localization was not shown to predict spontaneous passage. Additionally, there were no significant

difference between age groups (0–5 vs 5–15 years, p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, spontaneous passage of ≤1 cm ureteral stones in children could be predicted solely

with stone diameter. Therefore, expectant management strategies should be initially followed in

patients with ureteral stones <7 mm.

11:52–11:58

Discussion