Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  169 / 238 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 169 / 238 Next Page
Page Background

169

11–14 APRIL, 2018, HELSINKI, FINLAND

09:31–09:34

S22-5 (PP)

LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS

AND HIRSCHSPRUNG DISEASE: PREVALENCE, RISK

FACTORS AND MANAGEMENT

Matthieu PEYCELON 

1

, Liza ALI 

1

, Elisabeth CARRICABURU 

1

, Lise NATIO 

1

, Daphné

MICHELET 

2

, Chrystele MADRE 

3

, Christine VITOUS-BROT 

3

, Dominique BERREBI 

4

,

Christine GRAPIN-DAGORNO 

5

, Alaa EL GHONEIMI 

1

, Arnaud BONNARD 

6

and

Annabel PAYE-JAOUEN 

1

1) Hôpital Robert-Debré, Paediatric Urology, Paris Cedex 19, FRANCE - 2) Hôpital Robert-Debré, Paediatric

Anesthesiology, Paris, FRANCE - 3) Hôpital Robert-Debré, Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Paris, FRANCE - 4) Hôpital

Robert-Debré, Paediatric Pathology, Paris, FRANCE - 5) Hôpital Robert-Debré, Pediatric Urology and Surgery, Paris,

FRANCE - 6) Hôpital Robert-Debré, Pediatric Surgery, Paris, FRANCE

PURPOSE

To define the prevalence and to identify the risk factors of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and

outcomes after transanal endorectal pull-through (EPT) and Duhamel procedures for Hirschsprung

disease (HD).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data were retrospectively reviewed in all patients over 5 years with HD in our center between

2004 and 2012. They were divided into two groups, (A) EPT, and (B) Duhamel. Analyzed param-

eters included patients characteristics (birth weight, term, age at surgery), pathological findings,

postoperative complications, current clinical examination (Bristol and DVSS score, uroflowmetry).

Exclusion criteria: intellectual disability, definitive endostomy. Statistical analysis: Student and

Fisher tests.

RESULTS

111 patients were included (A=85; B=26) and 27 patients (24 %) (A=19; B=8) with a median age

of 6.5 years (A=6.1; B=8.5, p>0.05) were totally analyzed. Median follow-up was 83.4 months.

Median age at surgery was 32 days (A=18; B=186, p=0.04). Constipation occurred in 11 patients

(40.7 % (A=8; B=3, p>0.05)) and prevalence of LUTS was 22 % (A=4; B=2, p>0.05). Median DVSS

score was 10.8 (A=11.5; B=10, p>0.05) with a median Qmax of 17 mL/s (A=16.3; B=18.5, p>0.05).

Two patients (10.5 %) had detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia after EPT who needed catheterization

through a Mitrofanoff channel. Birth weight, term, age at surgery, sex, surgical approach, pathologi-

cal data and constipation score were not analyzed as risk factor for LUTS.

CONCLUSIONS

LUTS after HD are not uncommon and should be evaluated during follow-up. They could be due to

voiding disorders or a consequence of detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia. Surgical approach may not

be incriminated in LUTS prevalence. However a larger study is needed.