Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  158 / 238 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 158 / 238 Next Page
Page Background

158

29

th

CONGRESS OF THE ESPU

08:16–08:19

S21-3 (PP)

EFFICACY OF ELECTROMOTIVE DRUG ADMINISTRATION

(EMDA) OF BOTULINUM TOXIN A IN CHILDREN WITH

NEUROPATHIC BLADDER - OUTCOMES OF A PILOT STUDY

Claudia KOH 

1

, Charlotte MELLING 

1

, Cheryl JENNINGS 

1

, Malcolm LEWIS 

2

and Anju

GOYAL 

1

1) Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Paediatric Urology, Manchester, UNITED KINGDOM - 2) Royal Manchester

Children's Hospital, Paediatric Nephrology, Manchester, UNITED KINGDOM

PURPOSE

Intravesical injection of Botulinum toxin A (BtA) is well-established in managing neuropathic bladder

dysfunction. EMDA uses pulsed direct electrical current to enhance trans-urothelial drug delivery

and has been used for Mitomycin C, oxybutynin and lidocaine. It has been reported to be effective

for BtA delivery in children. This prospective study assessed the efficacy of EMDA of BtA (Botox

®

)

in children with neuropathic bladder dysfunction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ten children with urodynamically confirmed neuropathic bladder were administered BtA (Botox

®

) via

EMDA. Patients received between 3.3.units/kg and 10 units/kg (max 300) of Botox

®

. Urodynamic

studies were performed according to ICCS standards, before and 4–6 weeks after EMDA. Using

SPSSv24, the Wilcoxon test objectively assessed four variables: Bladder Capacity (% of EBC),

Compliance, pDetmax during detrusor overactivity and at capacity. Data are described using

median (IQR), pre and post-EMDA unless stated, with statistical significance defined as p <0.05.

RESULTS

Ten patients aged 12.6yrs (range 7.6–16.9yrs) had EMDA following baseline urodynamics.

9/10 completed post-intervention urodynamics. There were no adverse effects attributable to

EMDA. Statistically significant improvement in urodynamic parameters was not seen. Bladder

capacity (% of EBC) was 59.5(41.2–91 %) vs 53.0(34.5–76 %), p=0.678. Bladder compliance was

8.75(6.88–11.05 mls/cmH2O) compared with 9.0(2.85–11 mls/cmH2O), p=0.327. Pdetmax dur-

ing filling was 49(40.75–88 cmH2O) compared to 91(45.5–142.5 cmH2O), p=0.374. At capacity,

pdetmax was 28(21.75–40.5 cmH2O) vs 49(25.5–60 cmH2O), p=0.110.

CONCLUSIONS

EMDA offers potential economic and practical advantages of administering BtA without requiring

general anaesthetic. However, we could not demonstrate any objective improvement in urodynamic

parameters in neuropathic bladder dysfunction. This questions the ability of EMDA to transport BtA

molecules across urothelium.