Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  142 / 238 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 142 / 238 Next Page
Page Background

142

29

th

CONGRESS OF THE ESPU

15:22–15:25

S18-5 (PP)

BLADDER EXSTROPHY AND THE RISK OF URINARY

BLADDER CANCER IN SWEDEN 1952-2012

Gisela REINFELDT ENGBERG, Magdalena FOSSUM and Agneta NORDENSKJÖLD

Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Pediatric Surgery and Urology, Stockholm, SWEDEN

PURPOSE

Several reports suggest that exstrophied bladders have a significantly higher risk for developing

bladder cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk in a Swedish register study.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A matched designed cohort study was performed by linkage-analysis of Swedish national registers

based on the total population born 1952–2012; the National cancer register, the Cause of death

register and the National patient registers were used. After ethical permission we included analyses

of medical records. Inclusion criteria were: born in Sweden with classical bladder exstrophy accord-

ing to ICD coding. We used 5 controls per patient matched for age and sex.

RESULTS

We identified 180 validated cases, 98 males and 82 females, with bladder exstrophy. Two males

and 2 females, were diagnosed with urinary bladder cancer comparing to none in controls. The

mean age at diagnose was 39 years. Hematuria was the main symptom and all had had cystoscopy

performed 1–4 years prior to diagnose. Two were classified according to tumor grading systems.

Both presented with grade T4, were surgically treated with cystectomy, developed metastasis within

a few weeks-months, and died within 13 months of first symptoms. In the age group of 35–61, in

total 76 cases, the risk of urinary bladder cancer was 5.3 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Exstrophy patients have an increased risk of developing bladder cancer at a young age. The

cancer seems aggressive. Cystoscopy had been performed in intervals prior to symptoms without

detection and only palliative treatment was an option. This warrants further attention for optimizing

surveillance programs.

15:25–15:34

Discussion