Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  133 / 238 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 133 / 238 Next Page
Page Background

133

11–14 APRIL, 2018, HELSINKI, FINLAND

14:30–14:33

S17-3 (PP)

PUBIC SYMPHYSIS APPROXIMATION DURING

BLADDER EXSTROPHY CLOSURE WITH ABSORBABLE

VS NON ABSORBABLE SUTURE

Sarah BRAUNGART, David KEENE, Anju GOYAL, Tamas CSERNI and Raimondo

CERVELLIONE

Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Paediatric Urology, Manchester, UNITED KINGDOM

PURPOSE

Traditionally, non-absorbable suture has been used to approximate the pubic symphysis during

bladder exstrophy closure (BEC); erosion of suture through the urethra/bladder neck being a well-

known complication. The authors compared success and complications of BEC using absorbable

vs non-absorbable suture for pubic symphysis approximation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data was prospectively collected on consecutive exstrophy patients treated in one single institu-

tion between 2013 and 2017. Data measured included: age at surgery, pubic diastasis, use of

osteotomy, type of pelvic immobilisation, success of closure, postoperative complications including

need for intrapubic suture removal at follow-up cystoscopy. Two groups were identified: A) use of

non-absorbable suture for pubic symphysis approximation, B) use of absorbable suture. Outcomes

were compared with Fisher's test (categorical data), t-test (continuous data), a p-value of <0.05 was

considered significant.

RESULTS

Fourty patients underwent BEC, 24 (4 female) in group A and 16 (9 female) in group B. Median age

at BEC was 6.8 months (IQR5.5–7.2) in group A and 7.6 months (IQR5.5–8.8) in group B (p=0.2).

Median pubic diastasis was 4.6 cm (4.4–5.1) in group A and 4.5 cm (4.0–5.4) in group B (p=0.8).

All patients received pelvic osteotomies with external pelvic fixation. All patients had a successful

BEC. In group A, 38 % of patients were found to have the intrapubic stitch migrated into urethra/

bladder neck at follow-up cystoscopy. 3 of these patients required excision of granuloma or stones

that had formed around the suture. No intrapubic stitch was found at follow-up cystoscopy in group

B (p=0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of absorbable intrapubic sutures at time of BEC in the authors' hands does not affect success

of closure but prevents the morbidity associated with stitch erosion.

14:33–14:42

Discussion