Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  101 / 238 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 101 / 238 Next Page
Page Background

101

11–14 APRIL, 2018, HELSINKI, FINLAND

16:37–16:42

S12-2 (LO)

SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN THE YOUNGEST OF PATIENTS:

NO NEED FOR ADVANCED AIRWAY MANAGEMENT

AND REDUCED NARCOTIC USAGE

Kristin EBERT 

1

, Emmett WHITAKER 

2

and Venkata JAYANTHI 

1

1) Nationwide Children's Hospital, Section of Urology, Columbus, USA - 2) Nationwide Children's Hospital, Anesthesia,

Columbus, USA

PURPOSE

Concerns regarding potential negative effects of inhalataional and intravenous anesthetics on

neurocognitive development has led to a growing interest in alternative forms in infants. We report

on our institution’s outcomes with the use of spinal anesthesia (SA) for urological surgery in infants

less than 90 days of age, and compare their outcomes with a matched cohort of patients who

underwent general anesthesia (GA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients less than 90 days of age who underwent SA for four procedures (inguinal hernia repair,

scrotal exploration for torsion, PUV ablation, ureterocele puncture) were identified from our SA

database. An age- and procedure-matched control cohort was identified from a list of patients who

underwent the same procedures under GA. Outcomes recorded included success rate of spinal,

complications, narcotic and supplemental medication usage, airway management, need for sup-

plemental oxygen, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Forty patients were identified; 20 in the SA group and 20 in the GA group. The mean age of the

entire cohort was 45.3 days. Eighty percent (16/20) of SA patients had successful SA without

conversion to GA; reasons for conversion included 3 with a failed lumbar puncture and 1 with

refractory agitation. All GA patients had endotracheal intubation, whereas none of the successful

SA patients needed any airway management. SA patients were significantly less likely to receive

narcotics during the operative procedure compared to the GA group (p=0.001), and also had a sig-

nificantly lower mean morphine equivalent dose/kilogram (p=0.002). Patients in the SA group were

also significantly less likely to receive any supplemental medications during the operative procedure

(p=0.001), particularly intravenous corticosteroids (p<0.001). There were no significant differences

in length of hospitalization between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of SA in babies obviates the need for endotracheal tube placement and airway manage-

ment, and avoids the theoretic concerns regarding the effects of GAon neurocognitive development.